Panel sizes may vary among categories – and from year to year – depending on the perceived workload required and the availability of judges for a particular category. However, each panel will consist of at least three judges, one of which will be the panel convenor.
Judges are volunteers and are drawn from the speculative fiction community; from diverse professions and backgrounds, and may include academics, booksellers, librarians, published authors, publishing industry professionals, reviewers and enthusiasts. The only qualification necessary is a demonstrated knowledge of and interest in their chosen category.
Being an Aurealis Awards judge involves reading entries in a single category, which may comprise several dozen novels and/or more than a hundred short stories in the process of evaluating the year’s entries. Judges may keep their reading copies of entries.
It is vital that judges be able to work as part of a team and meet stringent deadlines. Most of the judges’ discussions are conducted via an online forum or email.
All discussions are confidential between the judges in each panel and the judging coordinator and/or the Aurealis Awards management team, as required. The Aurealis Awards judging coordinator will have no input into these decisions unless a panel of judges is unable to reach a consensus.
Judges from previous Aurealis Awards processes are welcome – indeed encouraged – to re-apply. But, in the interests of transparency and impartiality, no one may judge the same category for more than two consecutive years, and a break of two consecutive years is required before a judge can reapply to be a judge in that particular category again.
When judging application numbers make it possible, we split categories across multiple judging panels, for example, one for novels and one for short stories in a particular genre. Categories with traditionally small entry figures may be combined.
All judges for the Aurealis Awards will accept works electronically and will each nominate their preferred electronic file format. We strongly encourage submission of files in epub and mobi formats, although print, or rtf, doc and pdf files may be accepted.
The winner of the Convenors’ Award for Excellence will be reached by a consensus of the convenors of each of the judging panels.
Aurealis Awards finalists and winners in each category are selected by our judges.
2019 Judging Panels
Judging Coordinator: Tehani Croft
|CHILDREN’S FICTION PANEL|
|Liz Barr (panel convenor)|
|YOUNG ADULT PANEL|
|Miffy Farquharson (panel convenor)|
|FANTASY NOVEL PANEL|
|Stephanie Gunn (panel convenor)|
|SCIENCE FICTION NOVEL PANEL|
|Edie-Brie (Brie) Hawthorne|
|Cathie Tasker (panel convenor)|
|Dianne De Bellis (panel convenor)|
|Christine Yunn-Yu Sun|
|FANTASY NOVELLA PANEL|
|Linda Sengsourinho (panel convenor)|
|SCIENCE FICTION NOVELLA PANEL|
|Mark Fazackerley (panel convenor)|
|Dr David Reiter|
|FANTASY SHORT STORY PANEL|
|Fergus McCartan (panel convenor)|
|SCIENCE FICTION SHORT STORY PANEL|
|Rob Porteous (panel convenor)|
|ANTHOLOGIES / COLLECTIONS PANEL|
|Belle McQuattie (panel convenor)|
|Tansy Rayner Roberts|
ILLUSTRATED WORK / GRAPHIC NOVEL PANEL
|Heather Iveson (panel convenor)|
|T R Napper|