Rules

General Governance

The Aurealis Awards are administered on behalf of Chimaera Publications.

The selection of finalists and winners from entries in the Aurealis Awards process is the responsibility of selected judging panels. Panel sizes may vary among categories – and from year to year – depending on the perceived workload and the availability of judges for a particular category. However, each panel must consist of at least three judges.

Judges are selected by the Aurealis Awards management team following a public application process; any member of the public may apply. The management team reserves the right to select judges from the pool of applicants, and may seek additional judges should it be deemed necessary following the closure of the public application process. No correspondence will be entered into.

For more information about being an Aurealis Awards judge, go to the judging the Aurealis Awards webpage. It is anticipated that most disputes will be resolved by a consensus within the individual judging panels or with the assistance of the judging coordinator. Should a resolution not be achieved, the matter may be referred to the Aurealis Awards management team. In such cases, the management team’s decision is final and binding.

Entries

What works are eligible?

Any work of original speculative fiction written by an Australian citizen or permanent resident and published for the first time between 1 January 2025 and 31 December 2025 is eligible to be entered. Only the first published edition of a work is eligible for entry.

Works that have been created with the use of generative artificial intelligence are strictly forbidden from entry in the Aurealis Awards. This includes written and illustrative content.

In addition, as per the Australian Society of Authors’ statement on generative artificial intelligence, the Aurealis Awards agrees that all use of a creator’s work should be authorised, compensated and acknowledged, and that:

AI-generated products should be labelled as such. It is essential for educational, research and cultural institutions – as well as consumers – to be able to easily identify AI-generated works and AI developers and users must be required to declare when a work is wholly or partially AI-generated.

How to enter works?

Entry for the Aurealis Awards is via the online entry form.

Nominate for the Convenors’ Award for Excellence here.

Who can enter works?

Anyone can enter a work, however registrants must agree to send or submit a copy of the entered work to each judge in the category or categories in which the work is entered in a timely fashion.

Details for submission will be provided after works are registered.

Entry fee

There is no entry fee for short fiction entries (short stories and novellas), entries in the Children’s category, the Sara Douglass Book Series Award, or entries for the Convenors’ Award for Excellence.

There is an entry fee for works entered in all other categories. In an effort to ensure panels have sufficient time during the entry period to give due consideration to all entries, from 2025 this entry fee will be scaled. Works published between January 1 2025 and September 30 2025 must be entered by September 30 2025 to avoid the entry fee increase applied from October 1 2025. Works published in October, November and December will not be subject to the entry fee increase.

1. Entry forms submitted for long form works (novels, graphic novels, collections and anthologies) between July 2025 and September 30 2025 will incur a $10 entry fee, regardless of 2025 publication month.
2. Entry forms for long form works first published during October, November and December 2025 and entered any time during the entry period to November 30 2025 (final entry date) will incur a $10 entry fee.
3. Entry forms submitted for long form works between October 1 2025 and November 30 2025 (final entry date) but published prior to October 1 2025 will incur a $20 entry fee.

A list of entries appears on the Aurealis Awards website and is progressively updated during the year. Only formally entered works will be considered for the Awards.

Can I submit works digitally?

Yes, we encourage digital entry in all categories. Digital entries must be provided as epub files (if the epub format is available, PDF or Word files may be acceptable) to the judging coordinators for dissemination to the appropriate judges – individual judge’s emails will not be provided to entrants.

Entry deadlines

Aurealis Awards entries must be lodged via the online entry form by midnight 30 November 2025. Copies of entered works for the regular panels must be received by the judges at the addresses provided no later than 21 December 2025.

Convenors’ Award for Excellence entries close midnight 31 December 2025.

The Sara Douglass Book Series Award is not running in 2025.

Works published late in the year

The Aurealis Awards 2025 are for works of speculative fiction by authors, editors and illustrators, who are Australian citizens or permanent residents, first published in English between 1 January 2025 and 31 December 2025.

To avoid a logjam of work arriving at the very end of the awards process, we strongly encourage publishers and creators to submit ALL work published so far during 2025 as soon as possible after entries open, then submit work published after this date as soon as it is available. Please note the tiered entry fee for late entry of works published prior to September 30.

If a work is to be released in December, we recommend advance copies or page proofs be sent to judges as soon as possible. No published work may be carried over into the next year’s judging period.

In situations where a work is unexpectedly withdrawn from publication or pushed to the following year after entry, please advise the judging coordinator IMMEDIATELY so that it can be withdrawn from entry and be eligible when it is later published.

We are happy to accept electronic copies, photocopies or printouts of manuscripts or galleys of short fiction, providing the text is identical to that appearing in the final, published version. Long work should only be entered in galley form if it is in an easily readable format (unbound copies are not accepted).

Works submitted in proof form will be eligible for an award so long as at least one judge on the relevant panel or the judging coordinator sight a final published version on or by 31 December 2025.

The earlier our judges receive the work, the more time they will have to give it the consideration it deserves. 

We strongly encourage publishers and authors to enter all works published in the first half of the year by September 30, 2025, and then enter works as they are published. As previously noted, works published prior to September 30 2025 but entered in October or November will incur an entry fee increase.

The judging coordinators and judges are under no obligation to notify those entering if works cannot be considered because they are deemed ineligible under our rules and conditions.

The Aurealis Awards aim to be as comprehensive and as inclusive as possible, so if an eligible work does not appear on our list of entries then please email us to let us know about it. Every effort will be made to encourage that work’s author/publisher to enter it. However, please note that just suggesting a work be considered does not constitute a valid entry.

Categories

Each category has a panel of at least three judges who choose the best eligible works entered each year.

Science fiction

• best science fiction short story (less than 7,499 words)
• best science fiction novella (7,500 to 40,000 words)
• best science fiction novel (40,000 words or longer)

In all categories, literary merit, originality and contribution to the genre are of paramount importance in selecting the shortlisted works. Genre elements should not be enough to see a book on the shortlist; the Aurealis Awards is first and foremost a literary award. However, neither should a problematic definition of what makes a work of a particular genre bar an excellent book that contains appropriate elements of that genre, and the Aurealis Awards prefers an inclusive view of what genre markers may include.

A work in the Science Fiction category often contains elements based on imagined future scientific or technological advances, or major social or environmental changes, and may portray space or time travel or life on other planets. Science Fiction may include content such as futuristic settings, futuristic science and technology, space travel, time travel, faster than light travel, parallel universes and extraterrestrial life, and its imaginary elements are largely plausible within the scientifically established context of the story. The genre often explores the potential consequences of scientific and other innovations, and has been called a literature of ideas and change.

These guidelines are not intended to be proscriptive on the nature of genre in these categories. Rather, they are offered as an outline that should be considered fluid and as inclusive as possible within the nature of speculative fiction.

Fantasy

• best fantasy short fiction (less than 7,499 words)
• best fantasy novella (7,500 to 40,000 words)
• best fantasy novel (40,000 words or longer)

In all categories, literary merit, originality and contribution to the genre are of paramount importance in selecting the shortlisted works. Genre elements should not be enough to see a book on the shortlist; the Aurealis Awards is first and foremost a literary award. However, neither should a problematic definition of what makes a work of a particular genre bar an excellent book that contains appropriate elements of that genre, and the Aurealis Awards prefers an inclusive view of what genre markers may include.

A work in the Fantasy category usually incorporates imaginative and fantastic themes. These themes may involve magic or supernatural phenomena as a primary plot element. Events in these works frequently occur outside the ordinary laws that operate within the universe, whether in the acknowledged real world or in a wholly created one. A work of Fantasy often includes the activity of imagining impossible or improbable things.

These guidelines are not intended to be proscriptive on the nature of genre in these categories. Rather, they are offered as an outline that should be considered fluid and as inclusive as possible within the nature of speculative fiction.

Horror

• best horror short fiction (less than 7,499 words)
• best horror novella (7,500 to 40,000 words)
• best horror novel (40,000 words or longer)

In all categories, literary merit, originality and contribution to the genre are of paramount importance in selecting the shortlisted works. Genre elements should not be enough to see a book on the shortlist; the Aurealis Awards is first and foremost a literary award. However, neither should a problematic definition of what makes a work of a particular genre bar an excellent book that contains appropriate elements of that genre, and the Aurealis Awards prefers an inclusive view of what genre markers may include.

A work in the Horror category should be intended to disturb or inspire fear, dread or trepidation in the reader. The genre may include psychological suspense, occult fiction, dark fiction, and paranormal fiction. A work need not contain supernatural elements to be considered horror.

These guidelines are not intended to be proscriptive on the nature of genre in these categories. Rather, they are offered as an outline that should be considered fluid and as inclusive as possible within the nature of speculative fiction.

Young adult

• best young adult short fiction (less than 40,000 words)
• best young adult novel (40,001 words or longer)

In all categories, literary merit, originality and contribution to the genre are of paramount importance in selecting the shortlisted works. Genre elements should not be enough to see a book on the shortlist; the Aurealis Awards is first and foremost a literary award. However, neither should a problematic definition of what makes a work of a particular genre bar an excellent book that contains appropriate elements of that genre, and the Aurealis Awards prefers an inclusive view of what genre markers may include.

In this category, the genre guidelines above should be considered in conjunction with the age range of Young Adult. For the purposes of the Aurealis Awards, young adult can best be described as ‘teen fiction’, broadly 12-18 years.

Children’s

In all categories, literary merit, originality and contribution to the genre are of paramount importance in selecting the shortlisted works. Genre elements should not be enough to see a book on the shortlist; the Aurealis Awards is first and foremost a literary award. However, neither should a problematic definition of what makes a work of a particular genre bar an excellent book that contains appropriate elements of that genre, and the Aurealis Awards prefers an inclusive view of what genre markers may include.

In this category, the genre guidelines above should be considered in conjunction with the age range of Children’s fiction. The Children’s category is for younger readers, aged under 12 years.

Anthology and collection

• best collection (a volume of speculative stories or poems by a single author – must include three or more pieces)
• best anthology (a volume of speculative stories or poems by multiple authors, including a single issue of a magazine – must include three or more pieces)

In all categories, literary merit, originality and contribution to the genre are of paramount importance in selecting the shortlisted works. Genre elements should not be enough to see a book on the shortlist; the Aurealis Awards is first and foremost a literary award. However, neither should a problematic definition of what makes a work of a particular genre bar an excellent book that contains appropriate elements of that genre, and the Aurealis Awards prefers an inclusive view of what genre markers may include.

In this category, the genre guidelines above should be considered in conjunction with the definitions of Anthology and Collection.

Illustrated book or graphic novel

• best illustrated book/graphic novel

In all categories, literary merit, originality and contribution to the genre are of paramount importance in selecting the shortlisted works. Genre elements should not be enough to see a book on the shortlist; the Aurealis Awards is first and foremost a literary award. However, neither should a problematic definition of what makes a work of a particular genre bar an excellent book that contains appropriate elements of that genre, and the Aurealis Awards prefers an inclusive view of what genre markers may include.

In this category, the genre guidelines above should be considered in conjunction with the broad interpretation of what a graphic story / illustrated book / graphic novel may look like, with the illustrations / artwork contributing a significant component to telling the story.

The Convenors’ Award for Excellence

The Convenors’ Award for Excellence is awarded at the discretion of the convenors for a particular achievement in speculative fiction or related areas in the year for work that is not otherwise eligible in any of the existing categories for the Aurealis Awards due to the nature of the material. Entries normally eligible for existing categories, but made ineligible due to the author/editor being on the judging panel, are not eligible for consideration for the Convenors’ Award.

It can be for non-fiction, artwork, film, television, electronic or multimedia work, or other Australian speculative fiction related work which brings credit or attention to the speculative fiction genres.

The award was originally known as The Convenors’ Award for Excellence and was renamed in 2002 after Peter McNamara (d. 2004), publisher, editor and the original Aurealis Awards convenor, shortly after he was diagnosed with a terminal illness. In 2014, the award guidelines were revised and it was renamed to its original form, to avoid confusion with the Peter McNamara Achievement Award presented annually at the National Science Fiction Convention.

Entries for the Convenors’ Award for Excellence must be submitted to the Aurealis Awards coordinator using the Convenors’ Award for Excellence entry form by midnight EST, 31 December 2025.

The Sara Douglass Book Series Award

The Sara Douglass Book Series Award covers series ending (in original publication) in a three year period prior to the judging year. The Sara Douglass Book Series Award is an award is for a “series”, defined as a continuing ongoing story told through two or more books, which must be considered as ending in one of the years covered by the judging period. The Sara runs every three years. The Sara is not running in 2025.

This Award is intended to recognise that there are book series that are greater as a whole than the sum of their parts. It is anticipated that shortlisted works will be best enjoyed read in succession, with an arc that begins in the first book and is completed in the last. The series may be in any speculative genre within the extended bounds of science fiction, fantasy or horror (that is, if a book would be considered on an individual basis for one of the novel categories of the Aurealis Awards, the series may be considered here). The Sara Douglass Book Series Award does not replace or depose individual books being entered in the usual categories in the year they are first published – it is a supplementary Award.

Read more here.

For an entry

Each entry is categorised, and this information will be displayed on the list of Aurealis Awards entries.

Although works may be entered in more than one category, we urge you to only choose the most relevant, rather than make across-the-board, blanket entries.

Many categories attract an entry fee, which must be paid for each category entered.

It is rare, for example, for one work to be considered science fiction and fantasy and horror and YA. It is possible for a work to be a finalist and win in more than one category. But if a work is entered in multiple categories, a copy of the entry must be sent to all judges in each of the relevant categories and the entry fee must be paid for each category (if applicable).

The Aurealis Awards management team recognises the financial burden of entering multiple works in multiple categories to some authors, editors and publishers at independent small presses.

In the case of multimedia, if a work of this type is to be entered in the novel, anthology or collection categories, then judges will need to receive a copy of the work for their consideration but the work will be considered only on the literary elements. However, a multimedia format work not otherwise eligible for a regular Aurealis Award category may be entered and considered for the Convenors’ Award for Excellence as this special award has a broad scope and may take into account more than the printed word.

Regarding co-authored, edited or illustrated works

The Aurealis Awards 2025 are for works of speculative fiction by authors, editors and illustrators, who are Australian citizens or permanent residents, first published in English between 1 January 2025 and 31 December 2025.

In the case of co-authored novels or short stories, at least one of the authors must be an Australian citizen or permanent resident, and the Australian involvement may not be limited to illustration only.

To be eligible, anthologies must have been edited by an Australian citizen or permanent resident and first published in English in the period under consideration and contain three or more individual works. In the case of co-edited works, at least one of the editors must be an Australian citizen or permanent resident.

For single author collections, the entry must have been authored by an Australian citizen or permanent resident and contain three or more individual works.

Individual issues of magazines may be entered in the Anthologies category.

In the case of illustrated works or graphic novels (either work for adults or children’s picture books), either the writer or illustrator or both must be an Australian citizen or permanent resident and the entry first published in English between 1 January 2025 and 31 December 2025. More information about serialised and collated work in this area can be found in the FAQ section.

We aim to be as inclusive as possible and endeavour to do all we can to assist in the entry process. Enquiries may be emailed to the judging coordinator.

Conflict of interest

A novel or short story written by a judge is automatically ineligible to be entered for an award in that year in the category for which the person is a judge. Work is still eligible to be entered in other categories.

If the editor or co-editor of an anthology or collection is a judge in the anthology and collection category, then that anthology or collection edited or co-edited by him/her is ineligible.

Should a judge have any concerns about their eligibility or the appropriateness of reviewing a particular work, they should raise them with their convenor, who will then discuss the matter with the awards coordinator and make a ruling. This ruling will be final.

Judges are asked to inform their panel convenor of potential perceived conflicts of interest in their judging process (for example, editor of a short story, beta reader for a novel, spouse of an entrant). As this is a very small industry, everyone who could be a judge will almost certainly know at least some of the writers whose works come before them, and we rely on their capacity to be impartial about the quality of the work they are judging.

Novels or short stories written by other members of the Organising Committee are still eligible for consideration by the relevant judging panels. However, to maintain the integrity of the judging process, the following additional rules are to be observed: (1) If a judging panel requires clarification on any point, they will refer their query to the judging coordinator in the first instance. If the judging coordinator is unable to resolve the query, s/he may refer the matter to the President of the Organising Committee for joint resolution, provided there is no conflict of interest in doing so. (2) The convenor of each panel will notify short-listed works and the ultimate winner to the judging coordinator only.

The remainder of the Organising Committee will not be notified of the ultimate winners in advance of the Aurealis Awards ceremony.

Regarding blogs, websites, reviews, critiques and other public comments

Judges, the judging coordinator, and members of the Aurealis Awards management team may externally review or critique works which may be eligible for entry. These reviews or critiques may take the form of blogs, printed reviews, discussion panels and similar activities. However, as it is important that the awards maintain a level of independence and impartiality, all such reviews should contain a disclaimer emphasising that this is the personal opinion of the person involved and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the panel, the judging coordinator or the Aurealis Awards management team.

Similarly, we ask that judges refrain from commenting on shortlisted works within their category between the date the shortlist is publicly released and the announcement of the winners at the awards ceremony.

Most of the judges’ discussions are conducted via an online forum or email. All discussions between the judges in each panel and the judging coordinator and/or the Aurealis Awards management team are confidential. Judges may not discuss the process of the judging panel in any forum.

All members of the Aurealis Awards management team must also refrain from commenting on all shortlisted works within this time frame.

For more information and expansion on these Rules, please see our FAQ.